The strength of the U.S. dollar is a problem for a government determined to bring back the mercantilist policies of the late 19th century in America. As the chart below shows, the Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) for the USD is at an extraordinarily high level, well beyond previous peaks in 1960, 1970, 1984, and 2002.
Periods of dollar weakness are associated with strong international growth relative to U.S. growth and a spell of “American malaise,” while periods of dollar strength are linked to stronger U.S. growth and phases of “American exceptionalism.” The dollar has been appreciating since early 2011 in a remarkable occurrence of American exceptionalism, driven by a relatively strong recovery from the Great Financial Crisis, the shale oil and gas revolution, and the phenomenal success of America’s tech titans. Over the past decade, the dollar has also been buttressed by enormous capital flows into U.S. assets, which originate both from institutional investors seeking high returns and from capital flight from emerging markets.
It is unclear how dollar weakness could be engineered by the Trump Administration, as “America First” strategies would tend to favor U.S. growth at the expense of foreign partners and could lead to large investment inflows. Moreover, the chaos created by Trump’s disruptive nature may increase geopolitical risk and further encourage capital flight into U.S. assets.
We can speculate on which countries may be targeted by Trump for retributive attacks. The chart below shows the REERs of America’s main trading partners and emerging markets in terms of the current REER relative to the median of the past 32 years. Japan stands out as an outlier and as an easy target for forced currency appreciation. Europe, Mexico, and the Asian tigers (Korea, Taiwan, and Malaysia) also could be singled out. The circumstances of most emerging markets (Chile, Brazil, Nigeria, etc.) are very different, as currency weakness is not engineered to sustain export competitiveness but rather caused by low growth and capital flight.
How close is the US federal government to a structural deficit? Can small DOGE cuts here and there fix the deficit/debt situation while tax increases are off the table? Shifting the tax burden to consumption also appears to be off the table.
Tariff-lead industrial policy will impose near-term adjustment costs, risks increasing the value of the US dollar further penalizing net exports and could catalyze a major US economic slowdown, possibly a recession. In the background, the US reputation for ‘Speaking with Forked Tongue’ and failing to live up to commitments will hurt the US brand and cause semi-permanent damage to US reputation capital.
Demonizing and punishing China along with close allies will not solve thorny US structural economic problems in particular horrendously bad health bad outcomes and widespread substance abuse issues.
Thanks for breaking this down so thoroughly!
“What an insightful and thought-provoking article! It’s refreshing to see such a detailed exploration of this topic. At ExplodingBrands (https://explodingbrands.de), we often discuss similar ideas in our team meetings, and your perspective brings several new angles we hadn’t considered before. Your analysis of modern trends and their impact on society particularly resonates with our approach to understanding contemporary issues. The examples you’ve provided really help illustrate your points effectively. We’d love to explore these concepts further and perhaps contribute additional insights to this fascinating discussion. Looking forward to your future posts!”
Thank you for sharing such a thorough and thoughtful analysis. You’ve addressed so many important points, and I really appreciate the balanced perspective you’ve offered. It’s rare to come across content that’s not only informative but also written in a way that keeps the reader engaged from start to finish.
This was a fantastic read, and I’ll definitely be sharing it with others.