One of the most salient concerns with the current state of the the global economy is the very high level of corporate debt. This past week the OECD, the Dallas Federal Reserve and the Bank for International Settlements all warned that in an eventual economic downturn the solvency of corporate debt issuers is likely to deteriorate quickly and deepen the contraction.
The warning is highly relevant for emerging markets investors for two reasons; first, EM corporates have been active particants in the ramp up of debt, eagerly satisfying the chase for yield that lenders have pursued in response to quantitative easing policies; second, EM borrowers can be expected to suffer disproportionately if the lending cycle were to turn sour.
Rob Kaplan of the Dallas Federal Resrve did not mince his words this week (Link) in issuing a stark warning of the risk to the economy caused by the buildup of U.S. Corporate debt. Kaplan is concerned that the current high level of corporate debt will sharply deepen an eventual economic downturn. He points out that a preponderance of recent debt issuance has been used for non-productive and non-self-liquidating activities, mainly dividends, debt buy-backs and M&A activity. In addition, to an unprecedented degree, the debt has been rated BBB (barely one notch above high-yield, “junk”), and has come with more relaxed covenants. This is shown in the following chart two charts. The first shows the cyclical behavior of the corporate debt market and the current very high level relative to GDP, and the second shows the growing preponderance of lower quality issuers.
Kaplan notes that “in the event of an economic downturn and some credit-quality deterioration, the reduction in bank broker-dealer inventories and market-making capability could mean that credit spreads might widen more significantly, and potentially in a more volatile manner, than they have historically.” As in past recessions, downgrades of BBB-rated debt may flood the relatively illiquid market for high-yield bonds and cause severe dislocations.
Unfortunately for investors in EM debt, the U.S. high-yield bond market and the market for EM debt are extremely correlated. Therefore, any disruption in the U.S. high-yield market will be felt immediately in an accentuated fashion in the EM debt market.
This is the view expressed in the recently published OECD study, “Corporate Bond Markets in a Time of Unconventional Monetary Policy.” The report describes in ample detail a “prolonged decline in overall bond quality…and decrease in covenant protection” and predicts that many corporates issuers will suffer a downgrade to “junk” in an eventual economic downturn and face amplified borrowing costs. The report repeats the concerns expressed by Kaplan with regards to the size and low quality of global corporate debt. In addition, it focuses on the specifics of the EM debt market.
The OECD points to an “extraordinary acceleration of corporate bond issuance in emerging markets,” from$70 billion/year in 2007 to $711 billion in 2016. This is shown in the chart below.
The rise in borrowing has been particularly acute in China, but also highly significant across the rest of the emerging markets. Total EM corporate debt reached $2.78 trillion in 2018, up 395% in ten years.
The OECD identifies an alarming decline of the overall quality of the global corporate bond market. According to OECD analysis, by historical standards the quality of bonds is exceptionally low for where we are in the economic cycle. This is shown in the chart below.
The decline in quality is particularly severe for the overall quality of EM bonds, which just barely qualify as investment grade in 2018 after falling into junk status in 2017. The chart below compares the quality of EM bonds to developed market bonds, according to the rating methodology ued by the OECD.
To make matters worse, the repayment profile for emrging markets is considerably worse than for DM, with 80% of loans due over the next five years.
Interestingly, even though concerns of a global slowdown are growing, high yield bonds in general are performing well, displaying very low premiums by historical standards to risk-free bonds. This is partially because of QE (especially in Europe) but also because of desperate efforts to secure yield in a low-return environment. Look, for example, at the chart below of the HYEM, the emerging markets high yield bond ETF, which has rallied strongly since last September.
Conclusion
Investors in emerging markets should be aware of the considerable risks presented by the bond market. Any significant downturn in the global economy would likely lead to significant downgrades to high yield bonds and a strengthening of the U.S. dollar, and this may cause severe disruption of the high-yield market. The performance of emerging market equity markets, which are highly correlated to the EM high yield market, would suffer accordingly.
Trade Wars
- Xi needs a trade deal (FT)
- Should the U.S. run a trade surplus (Carnegie, Michael Pettis)
- Why the U.S. debt must continue to rise (Carnegie, Pettis)
- Turkey and India denied preferential U.S. trading status (FT)
- China, India and the rise of the civilisation state (FT)
- When democracy is no longer the only path (WSJ)
- The tremendous impact of the China-U.S. tech war (Lowy)
- Huawei hits back at the U.S. (FT)
India Watch
- Modi’s track record on the economy (The economist)
- Increasing Indian demand for copper (Gorozen)
- India’s growing share of oil imports (blog)
- India turns its back on Silicon Valey (Venture beat)
- India is right to resist cancerous U.S. tech monopolies (venture beat)
- 5 more years of Modi? (Lowy)
China Watch:
- Quality will drive China A- share returns (FT)
- China breaks world box office record (SCMP)
- Why China supports North Korea (Lowy)
- China’s PM frets about the economy (The Economist)
- China has no choice (Alhambra)
- China’s economy is bottoming (SCMP)
- MBS in Beijing (WIC)
- The story of the world’s biggest building (The Economist)
- U.S. cars are strugling in China (NYT)
- China’s tourist have political clout (The Economist)
China Technology
- Huawei’s big AI ambitions (MIT Tech)
- China’s EV startup Xpeng (WIC)
- An interview with fintech Creditease CEO (Mcinsey)
Brazil Watch
- Brazil’s crucial pension reform (Washington Post)
- Brazil’s finance guru (FT)
EM Investor Watch
- OECD Report on Global Corporate Debt (OECD)
- Russia’s global ambitions in perspective (Carnegie)
- South Africa stagnates as confidence wanes (Bloomberg)
- Postcard from Malaysia (Foreign Policy Journal)
- South Africa slumps (Barrons) South Africa Innovation (FT)
- Make hay while the sun shines in emerging markets (FT)
- Globalization in Transition (mckinsey)
Tech Watch
- Germany is losing the battery war (Spiegel)
- Does automation in Michigan kill jobs in Mexico? (World Bank)
- Robots and farming (Realclear markets)
- American energy independence is here (AL Advisors)
- Solving the productivity puzzle (Mckinsey)
- Autonomous trucks are coming fast (Mckinsey)
Investing
- Interview with Norbert Lou (Tao Value)
- Credit Suisse annual Investment Report (Credit Suisse)
- Who is on the other side? (Mauboussin)
- Factors and business cycles (Papers ssrn)
- 50 reasons not to invest for the long-term (Abnormal returns )
Is there an easy way to find the extent of public fiduciaries’ exposure to these classes of bonds or do you have to go through their voluminous listings?
Good question. I don’t know the answer.