The national identity of Russia is intrinsically tied to the mastery of the Eurasian steppes, the grassland plains that stretch from Hungary to Northern China. The territorial expansion of Moscow, from the 16th century onward, required wresting control of the steppes away from the Mongols and securing the fertile black earth plains of modern-day Ukraine and Central Russia. The eventual collapse of the Mongol empire in the 17th century allowed the extension of the Russian empire to the pacific. Russian geo-political control over the steppes, Siberia and the Pacific coast has been largely uncontested for centuries.
However, the economic rise of China over the past decades and its increasingly outward-looking pretensions, as highlighted by President Xi Jinping’s ambitious “One Belt, One Road Initiative” (OBOR) changes everything for Russia. While Russia has seen the steppes mainly for their value in securing geopolitical control of the Eurasian center, Xi envisions a return to the commercial dynamism of the historical Silk Road, which united the Far East with the Middle East and Europe for centuries, until the collapse of the Mongol empire. The Chinese have been aggressively executing Xi’s vision, building infrastructure to connect China with the West and becoming the largest investor in the natural resources of the former Soviet Republics.
Surprisingly, perhaps because of pragmatism and acceptance of Xi’s promise that the OBOR is aimed at benefiting all participants equally, so far there appears to be little resistance on the part of Russia to Xi’s grand and transformative plan. To the contrary, there has been a rapprochement between Putin and Xi, who have met on frequent occasions over the past several years. In a recent state visit to Moscow, Xi announced $10 billion in agreements for OBOR-related infrastructure investments and told the media that relations between the two countries were currently at their “best time in history” and that Russia and China were each other’s “most trustworthy strategic partners.”
Russia’s cuddling up with China is probably its best strategic option at this time. First, neither China nor Russia have to worry about business relations being undermined by volatile domestic politics or high-minded demands for human rights, and, in that sense, they see themselves as reliable partners. Second, both parties have an interest in weakening what they consider to be the arbitrary and hegemonic power of the United States. For example, both would like to see a weakening of dominance of the U.S. dollar and America’s discretionary control of the global financial system, so it is no surprise that Russia is accepting payment in yuan for commodities and that China is setting up a Petro-yuan-gold trading infrastructure in Shanghai and Hong Kong to facilitate non-dollar transactions.
Most importantly, however, is the fact that Asia will be the driving force of global growth and that its center of activity will be in China and its Far East neighbors. Driven by China, Asia’s share of world GDP will grow to 35% by 2022 (IMF forecast), and almost all of global growth in marginal output will come from Asia. With its abundant energy, mineral and farm resources, Russia is best positioned to meet growing demand for natural resources in Asia.
A remarkable essay written by President Putin this week clearly states Russia’s current state of mind regarding Asia, and the seemingly total embrace of Xi’s OBOR vision. In a remarkable turn of events, Putin and Xi have become the defenders of open markets and predictable rules of commerce, in stark contrast to Donald Trumps “America First” ideology.
Putin writes: (excerpts, full note available here.)
“As a major Eurasian power with vast Far Eastern territories that boast significant potential, Russia has a stake in the successful future of the Asia-Pacific region, and in promoting sustainable and comprehensive growth throughout its territory. We believe that effective economic integration based on the principles of openness, mutual benefit and the universal rules of the World Trade Organization is the primary means of achieving this goal.
We support the idea of forming an Asia-Pacific free-trade area. We believe this is in our practical interest and represents an opportunity to strengthen our positions in the region’s rapidly growing markets. Indeed, over the past five years, the share of APEC economies in Russia’s foreign trade has increased from 23 percent to 31 percent, and from 17 percent to 24 percent in exports. We have no intention of stopping there…
On a related note, I would like to mention our idea to create the Greater Eurasian Partnership. We suggested forming it on the basis of the Eurasian Economic Union and China’s Belt and Road initiative. To reiterate, this is a flexible modern project open to other participants.
Comprehensive development of infrastructure, including transportation, telecommunications and energy, will serve as the basis for effective integration. Today, Russia is modernizing its sea and air ports in the Russian Far East, developing transcontinental rail routes, and building new gas and oil pipelines. We are committed to bilateral and multilateral infrastructure projects that will link our economies and markets — such as the Energy Super Ring that unites Russia, China, Japan and the Republic of Korea, and the Sakhalin-Hokkaido transport link.
We are particularly focused on integrating Russia’s Siberian and Far Eastern territories into this broader network. This includes a range of measures to enhance the investment appeal of our regions and to integrate Russian enterprises into international production chains.
For Russia, the development of our Far East is a national priority for the 21st century. We are talking about creating territories of advanced economic growth in that region, pursuing large-scale development of natural resources and supporting advanced high-tech industries, as well as investing in human capital, education and health care, and forming competitive research centers…
We intend to engage in substantive discussions on all these topics at the 25th APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting this week. I am confident that, acting together, we will find solutions to the challenge of supporting the steady, balanced and harmonious growth of our shared region, and securing its prosperity. Russia is ready for such a collaborative effort.”
Fed Watch:
- Global risk-free rate hits 88-year low (Bank of England)
- Why rates won’t rise (Seeking Alpha)
- Zulauf on the market melt-up (Financial sense)
- Stiglitz, America’s rentist-monopolistic capitalism (The Nation)
India Watch:
- India government to promote electric vehicles (Economic Times)
- Modi lauds India’s better ease of doing business (Indian Express)
China Watch:
- When China leads (Project Syndicate)
- China wants big role in new Saudi mega-city (WIC)
- KFC in China (Caixing)
China Technology Watch:
- Google tries to enter China again with AI Bloomberg)
- How China will rate its citizens with AI technology (Wired)
- China’s focus on practical AI application (Arxiv.org)
EM Investor Watch:
- Brazil’s stagnation (FT)
- Small-scale farming in Africa (Joe Studwell)
- Saudi Arabia’s Saturday night massacre (Mauldin Economics)
- Putin sees Russia;s future is in the East (Bloomberg)
- Templeton launches 16 low-cost country ETFs (Liberty Shares)
- Things are looking up for Gazprom (Seeking Alpha)
Technology Watch:
Commodity Watch:
- Solar powered car (Futurism)
- Australia’s push to dominate lithium (Bloomberg)
- Tony Seba on tech disruption (Sl Advisors)
Investor Watch:
- ETFs are no bonanza for Wall Street (WSJ)
- Jeremy Grantham, why this time is different (WSJ)
- Isaac Newton’s lesson on financial gravity (WSJ)
- Caxton Partners on macro investing (Bruce Kovner)
- The frustrating law of active management (Thinknewfound)
- Fees on active share eat up returns (Thinknewfound)
- What makes a great investor (Macro-ops)
- Buffett and the power of compounding (Collaborative Fund)