After a decade of poor performance, it is understandable that emerging market stocks are not popular. Yet, if we look at the long-run, EM stocks have performed relatively well and provided useful diversification for investors.
The following chart shows the total return for both EM stocks and the U.S. market’s S&P500 for the 1988-2018 period, a period of 31 years that encompasses the modern history of emerging markets as an institutional asset class. The chart also shows the returns of a 50/50 portfolio re-balanced at the start of every year.
Even in the wake a a period of huge outperformance for the S&P500, EM stocks are still outperforming U.S. stocks by a slight margin over the period. However, they achieve this with deeper draw-downs (maximum loss during a year) and with greater volatility, two attributes that unsettle investors. The Sharpe Ratio (annualized return/standard deviation of annual returns) is much worse for emerging markets. Moreover, this is before considering the higher risk and cost of capital for investing in EM. When investing in EM, investors expect to be paid a premium to compensate for the higher risk, but this has not been the case over the period.
Nevertheless, EM does provide valuable diversification benefits. A simple annual re-balancing strategy (50% EM and 50% S&P500) enhances returns significantly, while providing a much more stable path of capital appreciation. This is because the two asset classes show highly uncorrelated returns over multi-year periods. During the period under consideration both asset classes individually go through extended periods of stagnation which are largely avoided through a re-balancing strategy. For example, U.S. stocks provided zero returns between 1999 and 2009, a period which saw EM nearly triple in value. The following decade(2009-2018) saw the reverse happen, with stagnation for EM stocks and high returns for U.S. stocks. The chart below illustrates the returns of EM, the S&P500 and an annual re-balancing strategy.
Trade Wars
- The trade war needs a global solution (Carnegie)
- On the benefits of foreign investments (Pettis, Carnegie)
- Aftermath, interview with James Rickards (Inst Risk Analyst)
India Watch
- India’s digital transformation (McKinsey)
China Watch:
- China deepens financial links as it joins benchmarks (IMF)
- The rise of factors in the China A share market (MSCI)
- How does factor investing work in China (Indexology)
- How smart-beta strategies work in China (Savvy Investor)
- China’s healthcare sector (globalx)
- China’s Communication Services Sector (globalx)
- China’s rare earths strategy (China File)
- China-India relations are stressed (Carnegie)
- China opens yuan commodity futures (SCMP)
China Technology
- Inside China’s biopharma market (McKinsey)
- China’s food delivery war (Bloomberg)
- How China took the lead in 5G technology (WP)
- China’s MIC 2025 plans are roaring ahead (SCMP)
- China’s EV future (The Econoist)
- China’s EV bubble (Bloomberg)
Brazil Watch
- Brazil-U.S. ties with Trump-Bolsonaro (The Dialogue)
- The bear case for Brazil (seeking alpha)
- Business optimism returns to Brazil (FT)
- The great Brazilian foreign policy realignment (National Interest)
EM Investor Watch
- Latin America’s stagnation (Project Syndicate)
- Investing in Vietnam Equities (Barrons)
- Turkey’s clash with the U.S. (GMFUS)
- Time to buy Turkish stocks (Seeking Alpha)
- Why EM underperforms when the dollar rises (knowledgeleaderscapital)
- Value + Catalyst: the Gazprom case (Demonitized)
- Latin America’s missing middle (McKinsey)
Tech Watch
- Investing in Asian Innovation (Oppenheimer)
- Trends in battery prices (BNEF)
- Mary Meeker’s Internet Trends report (techcrunch)
- Germany is losing the battery war (Spiegel)
- Does automation in Michigan kill jobs in Mexico? (World Bank)
Investing
- Investors have fewer reasons than ever for home bias (Morningstar)
- When everything that counts can’t be counted (Reformed Broker)
- How to position for the next recession (Capital)
- The stock market is about scarcity (Rosenberg)
- What to do when an investment strategy performs poorly (Advisor Perspectives)
- Value’s misery in context (validea)
- Equal-weighting as a source of alpha (seekingalpha)
- Investors have fewer reasons than ever for home bias (Morningstar)
- The death of value or deja-vu all over again (Swedroe, Alpha Architect)
- Value investing, death by a 1000 cuts (savvy investor)
- Bill Bernstein, “Who Killed Value” (Efficient Frontier)
- Bill Bernstein, “Of Mines Forests and Impatience (Efficient Frontier)
- The value spread in international markets (papers.ssrn)
- Trends Everywhere (AQR)